Equal parts horrific, dated, gothic, stately and sometimes silly, Hammer Horror (http://www NULL.hammerfilms NULL.com/) is a brand like none other in the world of genre cinema.
Founded in 1934, but known primarily for its horror films of the 60s and early 1970s, Hammer all but collapsed into obscurity in the 80s and 90s, only to be gloriously resurrected recently with the infusion of new investors and the success of Let Me In (http://www NULL.imdb NULL.com/title/tt1228987/) (the English language version of Låt den rätte komma in (Let the Right One In) (http://www NULL.lettherightoneinmovie NULL.com/)) along with the spooktacularly atmospheric Woman in Black (http://www NULL.imdb NULL.com/title/tt1596365/) starring Daniel Radcliffe.
For children of the 70s who spent their Saturday afternoons behind closed doors, glued to the tube while others played out in the terribly bright sunshine, Hammer films were the stuff of dark secrets — the cinematic equivalent of Playboy magazines hidden under the mattress. Hours were spent staring at blood run red and breasts laid bare. This wasn’t your grandparents’ Dracula: no Bela Lugosi staked off-screen with a anti-climactic thud. This was the towering threat of Christopher Lee, writhing in agony as Peter Cushing’s vigorous Van Helsing pulls a Douglas Fairbanks, and with one great leap, yanks the drapes that strip the flesh from the vampire Count, exposing a toothy skeleton, one that pops and fizzles before dissolving into dust.
Tame by today’s standards, Hammer Horror kept the British censors busy with X certificates for decades. At it worst, the studio could be and, in fact, was accused of poor taste (even exploitation). But at its best, Hammer re-interpreted — even re-invented — many of Universal’s classic monsters for more modern, mature audiences. Dracula. Frankenstein’s monster. The Wolf-Man. The Mummy. Re-imagined. Made more menacing. All in vibrant color. Crimson wounds gushed. Dark green forests loomed. And flesh? Skin tones of the scantily clad Hammer stable of beautiful women lit up the screen.
Still, what made Hammer films all the more memorable — immortal even — was that good always triumphed over evil. The nihilism that so saturated genre film in the post-Vietnam period that followed Hammer’s heyday was as much a world away as the amalgam of unnamed eastern-European towns that were so often the settings of many of Hammer’s greatest films. A handful of them are explored in detail below; their trailers are included in a YouTube playlist (http://www NULL.youtube NULL.com/playlist?list=PL9BH9hQ8rtdUbkVxapaOk9MhPQO02rdWm):
The Curse of Frankenstein (1957)
The first of Hammer’s gothic horrors is also its first foray into re-imagining Universal’s monsters. Also the first pairing of director Terence Fisher (http://www NULL.imdb NULL.com/name/nm0279807/) with actors Peter Cushing (http://www NULL.imdb NULL.com/name/nm0001088/) (as the Doctor) and Christopher Lee (http://www NULL.imdb NULL.com/name/nm0000489/) (as the monster). Here, Hammer would establish its trappings: castles, costumes and a decidedly British sensibility that at the same time never existed yet was always there. Cushing’s charisma is captivating. And Terence Fisher, who would go on to make four more movies with both Cushing and Lee, sets the tone for every Hammer Horror film to come.
Dracula (U.S. title Horror of Dracula) (1958)
Lee’s Dracula is aristocratic, powerful and sexual. He would go on to play the Count more times than any other actor (10 total; 7 for Hammer), but no performance is more (un)dead “on” than Lee’s first. The aforementioned ending, with Dracula crumbling to dust, may very well be the best ending of any vampire film ever made.
The Mummy (1959)
Another successful reboot by Hammer directed by Terence Fisher and starring actors Peter Cushing and Christoper Lee, The Mummy is the least radical of Hammer’s overhaul of classic monsters, but its mashup of Universal’s many mummy plotlines (primarily The Mummy’s Hand and The Mummy’s Tomb) coupled with a very modern attitude regarding respect for antiquities makes it more than the standard moan and stomp fare.
The Curse of the Werewolf (1961)
Loosely based upon Guy Endore’s seminal novel The Werewolf of Paris (1933) and far superior to any of the Lon Chaney Jr. movies — from sets to cinematography to a gripping performance by an overzealous Oliver Reed — Curse of the Werewolf curiously did not spawn a franchise for Hammer. The studio’s only experiment with lycanthropy, it remains one of the better werewolf movies ever made (the best, of course, being An American Werewolf in London).
The Gorgon (1964)
While not the best of director Fisher’s work with stars Cushing and Lee, The Gorgon is interesting for its odd choice of monster from mythology that turns the villagers of a middle-European town to stone. Ignore the sillier scenes where it’s clear that the lady is wearing a wig of rubber snakes and enjoy the creepy atmosphere and solid performances, once again, from Cushing and Lee.
Dracula, Prince of Darkness (1966)
Christopher Lee’s return to the role that made him famous finds the actor with nary a line of intelligible dialog nor a foil as compelling as Van Helsing; still, the formula works.
Plague of the Zombies (1966)
Two years before George Romero gave new, um, life to the genre, Hammer produced a zombie picture with something uncharacteristic for the studio: a political message — one of the aristocracy abusing and exploiting the working class. Oh, and it’s scary, with iconic images of limbs erupting from the ground.
The Devil Rides Out (1968)
Directed by Terence Fisher. Based on a Dennis Wheatley novel. Scripted by Richard Matheson. Starring Christopher Lee (in what he considered to be one of his best roles). About a satanic cult. Culminates in the evocation of the Angel of Death. What more could any Hammer fan want?
The Vampire Lovers (1970)
Inspired by Sheridan Le Fanu’s novella Carmilla and the first of three Hammer films to feature the Karnstein family of vampires, The Vampire Lovers made overt the sexuality that was always at the core of Hammer’s vampire films. Relaxed rules by the British censor and changing attitudes towards sexuality as the 1970s began meant all bets (and clothes) were off.
Starring the exotic, erotic Ingrid Pitt (http://www NULL.imdb NULL.com/name/nm0685839/)* as Mircalla / Carmilla, Vampire Lovers has an ethereal quality that can be attributed to the film’s director, Roy Ward Baker (http://www NULL.imdb NULL.com/name/nm0001928/). But it’s the soft-core lesbian scenes that most find memorable.
Dr. Jekyll and Sister Hyde (1971)
If Vampire Lovers opened the door for Hammer to explore the intersection of horror and sexuality, Dr. Jekyll and Sister Hyde broke through its wall. While at times silly (from the immortal power of female hormones to some of the film’s promotion via trailers and posters [EXCEPT the cool French poster shown here), it stands as one of Hammer’s most original offerings. From its script (which incorporates both Jack the Ripper and the body snatchers Burke and Hare) to its oddly look-a-like stars Ralph Bates and Martine Beswick, Dr. Jekyll and Sister Hyde ultimately succeeds because — as he did with The Vampire Lovers — director Roy Ward Baker plays the sexual themes, for lack of better words, straight.
No studio before or since more radically redefined gothic horror than Hammer. Though their reach may have exceeded their grasp, Hammer’s producers, directors, writers and actors pushed the limits of what horrors could be explored in cinema while still retaining that magic of film that is created when more is left to the imagination than on screen. By the mid seventies, audience tastes towards more explicit (Texas Chaninsaw Massacre) and big budget horror (The Exorcist) found Hammer scrambling to find its place. Ultimately, the studio stopped making as many features, explored other genres (kung-fu and urban thrillers among them), turned briefly to television, and then, finally, went into receivership.
The brand, however, survived, and with its recent successes among 21st century moviegoers, the “studio that dripped blood” (a title of a 1987 Hammer Films documentary) may possibly be back with a vengeance.
Fans can only hope.
Those wishing to explore the world of Hammer films further will find the following books invaluable: Marcus Hearn’s The Hammer Vault: Treasures from the Archive of Hammer Films (http://www NULL.amazon NULL.com/The-Hammer-Vault-Marcus-Hearn/dp/0857681176) along with The Hammer Story (http://www NULL.amazon NULL.com/Hammer-Story-Marcus-Hearn/dp/1845761855/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1350808353&sr=1-1&keywords=The+Hammer+Story), also by Marcus Hearn with Alan Barnes (including a foreword by Christopher Lee).
For the die-hard Hammer fan, there’s also Hammer Films: The Unsung Heroes (http://www NULL.amazon NULL.com/Hammer-Films-Unsung-Heroes-Behind/dp/0955767024/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1350808382&sr=1-1&keywords=Hammer+Films+Unsung), a limited edition by Wayne Kinsey (with a foreword by Barbara Shelley) that goes into great detail about the many people that comprised “the team behind the legend.”
All titles are available from Amazon.com (http://www NULL.amazon NULL.com) (along with this blogger’s book of fiction (http://www NULL.amazon NULL.com/Little-Knives-Twelve-Horror-Supernatural/dp/0595319653/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1350808433&sr=1-1&keywords=little+knives)). Excuse the shameless self-promotion.