Tag Archives: new year

Mummers, Murder, and Merrymaking

From 14th century Europe to 21st century Philadelphia, mummers have long been associated with colorful costumes, fun and frolic, music, and merrymaking. Their history, however, has not always been one of light-hearted holiday entertainment. Violence. Murder. Mayhem. As much as they are celebrated, many a mummer has been feared over the last 700 years.

When exactly the tradition of dressing up in costumes and traveling house to house to bother the neighbors began, no one is quite sure. They can at least be traced back to the end of the thirteenth century when Edward I (aka Edward Longshanks) held a wedding for his daughter at Christmas that included mummers.

The name itself finds its origins in the Old French “momeur” — from momer which can be translated as “to act in a mime.”

Performing “mummer’s plays” at Christmas (or Plough Monday, which came a bit later in January), mummers  — or guisers as they were sometimes called (for the disguises they wore) — would usually engage in mock combat, parading about in animal masks. The practice was popular enough of a tradition to spread beyond the British Isles to other English-speaking parts of the globe — including the new world, as far north as Newfoundland, and as far south as St. Kitts and Nevis in the Caribbean. Newfoundland, especially, had a rich tradition of mummery, brought by Norweigians and Swedes across the Atlantic in the early nineteenth century.

Over the years, characters like Father Christmas (who may have come into English tradition because of mummers), dragons, and the Devil began to take center stage in mummer’s plays — all performed in good fun. One mummer’s verse captures well their intentions.

“Here we stand before your door, 
As we stood the year before;
Give us whisky, give us gin,
Open the door and let us in.”

As years pass, mummers as colorful quasi-minstrels and oft-drunken merrymakers became part of British Christmas tradition. But by the middle of  the 19th century, they begin to be thought of as more of a nuisance. And in one particular case, as murderers.

The alleged murder of a fisherman named Isaac Mercer by a group of men disguised as mummers in 1860 is one of the most notorious crimes in Newfoundland history. So heinous was the crime that packs of mummers began to be feared. A legislative ban on mummers was even issued. It remained in place for over a century.

Mummers’ celebrations in America, however — which date back to colonial times — thrived.  And it is here that the tradition of mummery in the city of Philadelphia may find its origins. Philadelphia was the nation’s capital in 1790, and a large Swedish population — previously mentioned as a country rich in mummer tradition — lived in the city. President George Washington was even known to have initiated a tradition of receiving calls from mummers at his home. In the early nineteenth century, celebrations were lavish, but some became so raucous with drunkenness and the discharge of firearms in the streets that the city passed an act which declared that “masquerades, masquerade balls, and masked processions” were prohibited.

It didn’t work, and the law — never strictly enforced — was abolished in the 1850s. Celebrations continued in Philadelphia, pretty much uninterupted.

Still, by the end of the 19th century, mummers outside of the United States began to fall  out of favor. After the first World War, most British mummers’ groups (known as “sides”) disbanded.

But in Philadelphia, the tradition not only survived, it flourished. The city’s first official parade was on New Year’s Day in 1901. It continues to this day, and is now the oldest, continuous folk parade in the United States.

A few members of the Aqua String Band in the 2005 parade presenting their theme “Just Plain Dead” (taken from Wikipedia)

Still,  these mummers in Philadelphia are a far cry from the medieval revelers of old. Made up of various groups — comics, fancies, string bands and fancy brigades — Philadelphia mummers do not go door to door now begging for whiskey. Instead, they perform music and acts of comedy along Broad Street with ever more elaborate themes, costumes and productions as the years go by. It’s a proud tradition of community pride and charity for many, and one of embarrassment to some.

Is there a direct line — and link — between the medieval mummer and his 21st century Philadelphia counter-part? Insofar as the mummer represents joyous abandon and holiday celebration with elaborate costumes and behavior not otherwise so socially acceptable outside of the holidays, then yes. There is something in the human condition that wants to put on makeup or a mask and become someone different — all within the accepted social convention of a holiday and/or party.

To badly paraphrase Carl Jung, and force an analogous relationship between the wearing of a physical disguise and the mask that is our persona — “designed on the one hand to make a definite impression upon others, and on the other to conceal the true nature of the individual” (from his Two Essays on Analytical Psychology, 1953) — perhaps the (dis)guise of the mummer is an attempt to show others someone or something we can only be once a year.  Most individuals conform — go to work, consume, go to be bed, wake up, start again. The mummer, however, can be anything he or she wants: comical, colorful, musical, mischievous — jovial, yes, but even a bit menacing, depending on theme.

If for only one day out of the (new) year, the Philadelphia Mummer’s parade — for mummers at least, but for its spectators, too — is a vacation from convention and day-to-day norms.

In many ways, it is a holiday from one’s self. And we could all use that from time to time.

From Janus to Mnemosyne: Memories of the Year to Come

Time is elastic. 

When I wrote of the fluidity of time, I should instead have recognized its elasticity.

It’s a relatively simple equation: a year divided by the sum of total years lived will provide a percentage of perception. To a sixty-five-year-old man, a year is 1 and 1/2% of a life lived. For him, a mere twelve months fly by. But to that man’s five-year-old grandson, that same year is 20% of the child’s entire life. For that boy, summer seems an eternity away.

At the beginning of a new year, time seems so pressing. There’s an increased weight to the present. Yet none of us are prescient, and all of us wait. If only time could be sped up. Run backward. Paused. Played back again. Is that memory?

We can remember, but can we will ourselves forward — beyond the next moment? Like the tension on a rubber band, can we stretch our minds and snap across time?

MENTAL TIME TRAVEL

Chronesthesia. Episodic memory. Mental time travel. First suggested by Endel Tulving in the 1980s, mental time travel refers to the ability to be aware in the present of both one’s past and one’s future.

A process that involves episodic thinking, travel to the past involves the memory of autobiographical events. I recall celebrating New Year’s Eve in Times Square this year. I had a lot to drink.

Travel to the future is the recall and integration of relevant information from memory coupled with the projection and processing of self-reference in subjective time. I will celebrate New Year’s Eve in Times Square again this year. But I won’t drink as much.

For Tulving, awareness of past and future comes down to the perception of self in subjective time. We presume we were present in Times Square on New Year’s Eve because we can remember the time, the place, the sum of our sensory data and even our emotions from a given moment. We then assume we can be present at a future point in history because we can use relevant episodic memory to conceive of a time, place, emotions and sensory information familiar to us and associated with that time.

We think in cycles. And while much of the pattern is due to our conditioning from the calendar, some of it is simply hard-wired into our DNA. We look back not in a line but in a circle. We can project forward because we know the wheel will come around again.

Which takes us back to January. And the timing of this post.

While looking forward to the future has been a part of the human condition pretty much since there was a human condition, celebrating the new year in January is a relatively new phenomenon (and writing about it near the end of the month? sheer procrastination).

MARCH MADNESS

Rituals give meaning to the passage of time. From the primitive cogitations of earliest man to the shallow observations of Ryan Seacrest — the passage of time necessitates ritual meaning. But the date for celebration has been in debate for millennia.

Bust of Janus, Vatican Museum, from Wikipedia Commons
Bust of Janus at the Vatican

Four thousand years ago, the Babylonians celebrated their new year in late March, around the time of the vernal equinox. Others among the ancients — including the Egyptians, Persians and Phoenicians — instead began their year with the fall equinox. And the Greeks — whose God Janus (a deity of doorways and passages, endings and beginnings) looks forward and back to both new year and old — marked their new year with the winter solstice.

January did not even exist until around 700 B.C.E., when Numa Pontilius, the successor to Romulus and second king of Rome, added it. The first time the new year was celebrated on January 1st was in Rome in 153 B.C.E. when the new year was moved from March to January to honor newly elected officials of the Roman Republic. Still, as with most pagan customs,  the celebration of new year in March continued for quite some time.

January 1st was officially Instituted as the beginning of the New Year in 46 B.CE. when Julius Caesar adopted a solar-based calendar (hence the name Julian Calendar). The practice would last for six hundred years until the Council of Tours where the celebration of January 1st was deemed pagan and the new year moved to December 25th, the birth of Christ. Celebrations at the vernal equinox were absorbed into Annunciation Day (the day Mary was told by the angel Gabriel that she would bear a child [i.e., conceived and therefore nine months before his birth]).

Still, many countries stuck to March as the start of the new year. The Church responded by celebrating January 1st as the day of Christ’s circumcision (now better known as the Solemnity of Mary),  thereby still raising the significance of the first of the day of the Julian calendar to some higher purpose that could hope to compete with an equinox. In 1582, the Gregorian Calendar (named for Pope Gregory XIII) was instituted as a replacement for the Julian calendar; it made some mathematical corrections to, among other things, align Easter celebrations with the vernal Equinox. The equinox thus retained as holiday, January 1 could be reclaimed as the beginning of the year.

Most western European countries soon changed the start of the year to January 1 (including Scotland in 1600). But England, Ireland and the British colonies (including the colonial Americans)  took their grand old time to officially  adopt the Gregorian calendar’s start of the year on January 1 (following the Calendar (New Style) Act 1750 [curiously enacted in 1752]) .

A few hundred years later and the issue is finally settled.

ALL LIES IN PERCEPTION

The history of how humanity has measured the new year has little to no bearing on how each of us marks time.  It is the individual that perceives time’s passage that determines the beginning or end of the year.

You may think of it as the beginning of the new year. To someone else, it’s Wednesday.

Not surprisingly, our methods are not tied to calendars. Instead — as neuroscience and psychology would have us believe — time and our perception of it, is tied to memory and expectation.

The year begins in January because that’s how we personally remember it. We are aware of our past and our future because we can conceive that one happened and the other will happen.

We have memories of the year to come.